Employee or Independent Contractor: When Is the Principal Liable for the Person's Tort?
The contract label is not always controlling. The relationship and scope of work matter.
Employee relationship
The more control the principal has over how work is performed, the more employee status can be supported under applicable agency principles.
Respondeat superior
An employer can generally be vicariously liable for employee torts committed within the scope of employment.
Independent contractor
A principal generally has less automatic vicarious liability for an independent contractor's torts, though important exceptions exist.
Direct liability
A principal can sometimes face direct liability for its own negligence even when vicarious liability does not apply.
The takeaway
Employee status and scope of employment drive much of the vicarious-liability analysis, while independent-contractor liability generally follows narrower exceptions.
Related Summit guides
FAQ
Does calling someone an independent contractor make it legally true?
No.
Can an employer be liable for an employee's workplace tort?
Yes under applicable circumstances.
Can a principal ever be liable for an independent contractor?
Yes, exceptions exist.